Skip to content

Both.org

News, Opinion, Tutorials, and Community for Linux Users and SysAdmins

Primary Menu
  • About Us
  • Computers 101
    • Hardware 101
    • Operating Systems 101
  • Linux
    • Why I use Linux
    • The real reason we use Linux
  • My Linux Books
    • systemd for Linux SysAdmins
    • Using and Administering Linux – Zero to SysAdmin: 2nd Edition
    • The Linux Philosophy for SysAdmins
    • Linux for Small Business Owners
    • Errata
      • Errata for The Linux Philosophy for SysAdmins
      • Errata for Using and Administering Linux — 1st Edition
      • Errata for Using and Administering Linux — 2nd Edition
  • Open Source Resources
    • What is Open Source?
    • What is Linux?
    • What is Open Source Software?
    • The Open Source Way
  • Write for us
    • Submission and Style guide
    • Advertising statement
  • Downloads
  • Home
  • Cinnamon: A Tale of Forks and Familiarity in the Linux Desktop Landscape
  • Cinnamon
  • Desktop
  • Linux

Cinnamon: A Tale of Forks and Familiarity in the Linux Desktop Landscape

Cinnamon is a familiar interface to welcome newcomers transitioning from Windows or macOS.
Don Watkins January 13, 2024 5 minutes read
Cinnamon

formulatehealth, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia

1

Last Updated on February 4, 2026 by David Both

Image by formulatehealth: CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia

As a long-time Linux user, I’ve witnessed firsthand the power of a familiar interface in welcoming newcomers to open-source computing. The transition from Windows or macOS can be daunting, navigating unfamiliar layouts and paradigms. This is where Cinnamon shines. Its unwavering commitment to the traditional desktop metaphor – the panel, menus, and applets we know and love – provides a comfortable bridge, easing users into the vast potential of Linux without sacrificing ease of use.

I have used Cinnamon across prominent distributions like Fedora, Ubuntu, and its home – Linux Mint.  While all of the implementations are good Linux Mint is my favorite because it supports Flatpak.

Within the vibrant ecosystem of Linux desktop environments, Cinnamon occupies a unique space. Born from a desire for a familiar desktop experience amidst UI shifts, Cinnamon has carved its niche through a blend of traditional design, lightweight resource usage, and extensive customization options. This article delves into the history of Cinnamon, its core features, and how its implementations on these three distributions showcase its adaptability and appeal.

A Fork in the Road: From GNOME to Cinnamon

In 2011, the release of GNOME 3, with its radical interface shift, sparked discontent among users accustomed to the traditional desktop metaphor. Enter Linux Mint, a distribution renowned for user-friendliness, which chose to fork GNOME Shell and create its desktop environment: Cinnamon. The initial goal was to preserve the familiar panel-based layout, menus, and applets cherished by many Linux users.

Cinnamon quickly blossomed from a mere fork into a fully independent desktop environment. It retained the core GNOME technologies like GTK+ but built its components, including the Muffin window manager, Nemo file manager, and the Cinnamon Control Center, a fork of the Gnome control center. This independence allowed Cinnamon to evolve at its own pace, prioritizing stability, user preferences, and resource efficiency.

The Core of Cinnamon: Familiarity with a Flair

Cinnamon offers a desktop experience reminiscent of Windows XP and GNOME 2. At its heart lies a familiar panel encompassing a start menu, quick-launch icons, running applications, and system tray notifications. Users can customize the panel elements and their behavior and add applets for enhanced functionality. The applets include accessibility, display, corner bar, on-screen keyboard, panel launchers for favorite applications, workspace switcher, and many more. 

Screenshot from Don Watkins Linux Mint 21.2 system CC by SA 4.0

Beyond the traditional layout, Cinnamon boasts modern features like workspaces, desktop effects, and theme customization. The Cinnamon Control Center provides granular control over system settings, making it easy to personalize the experience. Resource efficiency remains a cornerstone, ensuring smooth operation on older hardware and a snappy user experience.





















Screenshot from Don Watkins Linux Mint 21.2 system CC by SA 4.0

Cinnamon’s Many Faces: Distributions and Distinctions

While adhering to its core principles, Cinnamon adapts to its surroundings across different distributions. Let’s explore the nuances of Cinnamon implementations on Fedora, Ubuntu, and Linux Mint:

Fedora Cinnamon: Geared towards advanced users and developers, Fedora Cinnamon offers greater upstream integration and bleeding-edge software releases. Fedora Cinnamon allows users to run on the latest kernel version, 6.5.6, in Fedora 39 with the BTRFS file system instead of EXT4 on Linux Mint and Ubuntu. Fedora uses dnfagora to load software by default. Do yourself a favor and install Gnome Software Center. Once that is done, installing software on Fedora Cinnamon is much easier. Once the Gnome Software Center is installed, you can easily install ‘rpm’ or ‘flatpak’ software packages. 

$ sudo dnf install gnome-software. 

ScreenShot from Fedora 39 Cinnamon desktop by Don Watkins CC by SA 4.0

Ubuntu Cinnamon: Ubuntu Cinnamon offers a good implementation of Cinnamon with support for the Snap Store software center. and traditional ‘.deb’ packages either on the command line or from the Software Center. If you want to add software from Flathub, you’ll have to install those packages yourself. Ubuntu Cinnamon supports a large number of desktop backgrounds and sets itself apart from Fedora there. Ubuntu Cinnamon runs on an EXT4 filesystem and Linux Kernel 6.2.0-39. 

Linux Mint Cinnamon: As the birthplace of Cinnamon, Linux Mint offers the most polished and feature-rich experience. The default Mint themes and applets are meticulously designed, and the Cinnamon Control Center boasts even more granular customization options. Linux Mint Cinnamon 21.2 runs on Linux Kernel 5.15.0.  Beyond familiarity, Linux Mint empowers users with Flatpak right out of the box.   This flexibility, coupled with the comfort of a familiar desktop, creates a perfect recipe for Linux newbies to explore the boundless possibilities of open-source software.

Conclusion: A Spice of Choice for Every Palate

Cinnamon’s adaptability and focus on user needs have won it a loyal following. Its implementations on Fedora, Ubuntu, Arch, Linux Mint Debian Edition, and Linux Mint exemplify its versatility, catering to different user choices within the Linux community. Whether you seek bleeding-edge software, a familiar experience, or the most refined Cinnamon environment, each distribution offers a unique flavor of this popular desktop. Ultimately, Cinnamon’s success lies in its commitment to familiarity, customization, and resource efficiency, offering a user-centric and visually appealing alternative in the diverse landscape of Linux desktops.

 

Tags: Cinnamon Desktop

Post navigation

Previous: SysAdmin careers: Curiosity is an asset
Next: Monitoring Linux and Windows hosts with Glances

Related Stories

Photo by Scott Rodgerson on Unsplash
  • Cloud
  • Digital sovereignty
  • Linux
  • Open Source
  • Security

Digital sovereignty

Seth Kenlon May 15, 2026
Puzzle pieces coming together to form a computer screen
  • Fortran 77
  • History
  • Linux

A look back: f2c

Jim Hall May 13, 2026
Ubuntu-Resolute-Raccoon
  • Getting Started
  • Linux
  • Ubuntu

Getting started with Linux: Ubuntu 26.04

Don Watkins May 12, 2026

Random Quote

On Linux you’re an admin
On Mac you’re an end user
On Windows you’re a victim

— @sudoku.bsky.social

Why I’ve Never Used Windows

On February 12 I gave a presentation at the Triangle Linux Users Group (TriLUG) about why I use Linux and why I’ve never used Windows.

Here’s the link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/live/uCK_haOXPFM 

Why there’s no such thing as AI

Last October at All Things Open (ATO) I was interviewed by Jason Hibbits of We Love Open Source. It’s posted in the article “Why today’s AI isn’t intelligent (yet)“.

Technically We Write — Our Partner Site

Our partner site, Technically We Write, has published a number of articles from several contributors to Both.org. Check them out.

Technically We Write is a community of technical writers, technical editors, copyeditors, web content writers, and all other roles in technical communication.

Subscribe to Both.org

To comment on articles, you must have an account.

Send your desired user ID, first and last name, and an email address for login (this must be the same email address used to register) to subscribe@both.org with “Subscribe” as the subject line.

You’ll receive a confirmation of your subscription with your initial password as soon as we are able to process it.

Administration

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

License and AI Statements

Both.org aims to publish everything under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license. Some items may be published under a different license. You are responsible to verify permissions before reusing content from this website.

The opinions expressed are those of the individual authors, not Both.org.

You may not use this content to train AI.

 

Advertising Statement

Both.org does not sell advertising on this website.


Advertising may keep most websites running—but at Both.org, we’re committed to keeping our corner of the web ad-free. Both.org does not sell advertising on the website. Nor do we offer sponsored articles at this time. We’ll update this page if our position on sponsorships changes.

We want to be open about how the website is funded. Both.org is supported entirely by David Both and a few other dedicated individuals.

 

 

Copyright © All rights reserved. | MoreNews by AF themes.